# Equation

**EQUATION** (from Lat. *aequatio*, *aequare*, to equalize), an expression or statement of the equality of two quantities.
Mathematical equivalence is denoted by the sign =, a symbol invented by Robert Recorde (1510-1558), who considered that nothing could be more equal than two
equal and parallel straight lines. An equation states an equality existing between two classes of quantities, distinguished as known and unknown; these
correspond to the data of a problem and the thing sought. It is the purpose of the mathematician to state the unknowns separately in terms of the knowns; this
is called solving the equation, and the values of the unknowns so obtained are called the roots or solutions. The unknowns are usually denoted by the terminal
letters, ... x, y, z, of the alphabet, and the knowns are either actual numbers or are represented by the literals a, b, c, etc..., *i.e.* the
introductory letters of the alphabet. Any number or literal which expresses what multiple of term occurs in an equation is called the coefficient of that term;
and the term which does not contain an unknown is called the absolute term. The degree of an equation is equal to the greatest index of an unknown in the
equation, or to the greatest sum of the indices of products of unknowns. If each term has the sum of its indices the same, the equation is said to be
homogeneous. These definitions are exemplified in the equations: -

An equation admits of description in two ways: - (1) It may be regarded purely as an algebraic expression, or (2) as a geometrical locus. In the first
case there is obviously no limit to the number of unknowns and to the degree of the equation; and, consequently, this aspect is the most general. In the second
case the number of unknowns is limited to three, corresponding to the three dimensions of space; the degree is unlimited as before. It must be noticed, however,
that by the introduction of appropriate hyperspaces, *i.e.* of degree equal to the number of unknowns, any equation theoretically admits of geometrical
visualization, in other words, every equation may be represented by a geometrical figure and every geometrical figure by an equation. Corresponding to these two
aspects, there are two typical methods by which equations can be solved, viz. the algebraic and geometric. The former leads to exact results, or, by methods of
approximation, to results correct to any required degree of accuracy. The latter can only yield approximate values: when theoretically exact constructions are
available there is a source of error in the draughtsmanship, and when the constructions are only approximate, the accuracy of the results is more problematical.
The geometric aspect, however, is of considerable value in discussing the theory of equations.

*History.* - There is little doubt that the earliest solutions of equations are given, in the Rhind papyrus, a hieratic document written some 2000
years before our era. The problems solved were of an arithmetical nature, assuming such forms as "a mass and its 1/7th makes 19." Calling the unknown mass x, we have given x + 1/7 x = 19, which
is a simple equation. Arithmetical problems also gave origin to equations involving two unknowns; the early Greeks were familiar with and solved simultaneous
linear equations, but indeterminate equations, such, for instance, as the system given in the "cattle problem" of Archimedes, were not seriously
studied until Diophantus solved many particular problems. Quadratic equations arose in the Greek investigations in the doctrine of proportion, and
although they were presented and solved in a geometrical form, the methods employed have no relation to the generalized conception of algebraic geometry which
represents a curve by an equation and vice versa. The simplest quadratic arose in the construction of a mean proportional (x) between two lines (a, b), or in
the construction of a square equal to a given rectangle; for we have the proportion a:x = x:b; *i.e.* x = ab. A more general equation, viz. x − ax
+ a = 0, is the algebraic equivalent of the problem to divide a line in medial section; this is solved in *Euclid*, ii. 11. It is possible that Diophantus
was in possession of an algebraic solution of quadratics; he recognized, however, only one root, the interpretation of both being first effected by the Hindu
Bhaskara. A simple cubic equation was presented in the problem of finding two mean proportionals, x, y, between two lines, one double the other. We have a:x =
x:y = y:2a, which gives x = ay and xy = 2a; eliminating y we obtain x = 2a, a simple cubic. The Greeks could not solve this equation, which also arose in
the problems of duplicating a cube and trisecting an angle, by the ruler and compasses, but only by mechanical curves such as the cissoid, conchoid and
quadratrix. Such solutions were much improved by the Arabs, who also solved both cubics and biquadratics by means of intersecting conics; at the same time, they
developed methods, originated by Diophantus and improved by the Hindus, for finding approximate roots of numerical equations by algebraic processes. The
algebraic solution of the general cubic and biquadratic was effected in the 16th century by S. Ferro, N. Tartaglia, H. Cardan and L. Ferrari (see Algebra:
*History*). Many fruitless attempts were made to solve algebraically the quintic equation until P. Ruffini and N.H. Abel proved the problem to be
impossible; a solution involving elliptic functions has been given by C. Hermite and L. Kronecker, while F. Klein has given another solution.

In the geometric treatment of equations the Greeks and Arabs based their constructions upon certain empirically deduced properties of the curves and figures
employed. Knowing various metrical relations, generally expressed as proportions, it was found possible to solve particular equations, but a general method was
wanting. This lacuna was not filled until the 17th century, when Descartes discovered the general theory which explained the nature of such solutions, in
particular those wherein conics were employed, and, in addition, established the most important facts that every equation represents a geometrical locus, and
conversely. To represent equations containing two unknowns, x, y, he chose two axes of reference mutually perpendicular, and measured x along the horizontal
axis and y along the vertical. Then by the methods described in the article Geometry: *Analytical*, he showed that - (1) a linear equation represents a
straight line, and (2) a quadratic represents a conic. If the equation be homogeneous or break up into factors, it represents a number of straight lines in the
first case, and the loci corresponding to the factors in the second. The solution of simultaneous equations is easily seen to be the values of x, y
corresponding to the intersections of the loci. It follows that there is only one value of x, y which satisfies two linear equations, since two lines intersect
in one point only; two values which satisfy a linear and quadratic, since a line intersects a conic in two points; and four values which satisfy two quadratics,
since two conics intersect in four points. It may happen that the curves do not actually intersect in the theoretical maximum number of points; the principle of
continuity (see Geometrical Continuity) shows us that in such cases some of the roots are imaginary. To represent equations involving three unknowns x, y, z, a
third axis is introduced, the z-axis, perpendicular to the plane xy and passing through the intersection of the lines x, y. In this notation a linear equation
represents a plane, and two linear simultaneous equations represent a line, *i.e.* the intersection of two planes; a quadratic equation represents a
surface of the second degree. In order to graphically consider equations containing only one unknown, it is convenient to equate the terms to y; *i.e.* if
the equation be ƒ(x) = 0, we take y = ƒ(x) and construct this curve on rectangular Cartesian co-ordinates by determining the values of y which
correspond to chosen values of x, and describing a curve through the points so obtained. The intersections of the curve with the axis of x gives the real roots
of the equation; imaginary roots are obviously not represented.

*Bibliography.* - For the general theory see W.S. Burnside and A.W. Panton, *The Theory of Equations* (4th ed., 1899-1901); the Galoisian
theory is treated in G.B. Matthews, *Algebraic Equations* (1907). See also the *Ency. d. math. Wiss.* vol. ii.

[1] The coefficients were selected so that the roots might be nearly 1, 2, 3.

[2] The third edition (1826) is a reproduction of that of 1808; the first edition has the date 1798, but a large part of the contents is taken from memoirs of 1767-1768 and 1770-1771.

[3] The earlier demonstrations by Euler, Lagrange, etc, relate to the case of a numerical
equation with real coefficients; and they consist in showing that such equation has always a real quadratic divisor, furnishing two roots, which are either real
or else conjugate imaginaries α + βi (see Lagrange's *Equations numériques*).

[4] The square root of α + βi can be determined by the extraction of square roots of positive real numbers, without the trigonometrical tables.

*Note - this article incorporates content from Encyclopaedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, (1910-1911)*